Yes, it will be a very effective measure to curb corruption.
Yes, it is a positive gesture even though it may not be very effective in fighting corruption.
Yes, those who fear this policy must have something dirty to hide.
No, government officials have the right of privacy.
No, the government should find other ways to monitor the assets status of officials.
No, it is simply useless.
Other (Any comment?)
It is an effective anti-monopoly measure and the right decision.
This decision will help the healthy development of China´s juice industry.
China should build more international brands of its own.
The government should not interfere with the market operation.
This may arouse suspicion of protectionism.
As long as the product is of good quality and reasonable price, I don´t care it is a Chinese brand or a foreign one.
This is not a good example for other countries in the current world economic situation.
Hard to say
Bad nutrition and junk food
Contamination of raw materials
Selling of expired food
Methods of food processing
Insufficient food safety supervision and inspection
Out-of-date food safety standards
Food manufacturers‘ lack of social responsibility
Monopolized industries are too powerful
High costs of seeking protection
Insuffient enforcement of the "Law on the Protection of Consumers‘ Rights and Interests"
It is too much trouble and not worth the time
Limited functions of the consumers‘ association
Consumers lack the awareness of their lawful rights
Mild punishments for unlawful business behaviors
Complain to the manufacturer, service provider or seller and demand compensation
Keep quiet and never go back there again
Complain to yourself and wish bad things happen to the bad guy
Go to the consumers‘ association and file a complaint
Dial “12315” and file a complaint
Publish an announcement on TV or in the newspaper
Start a legal action at the people‘s court
Expose the product or service and the manufacturer, service provider or seller on the internet as a warning to other people